Salient parts of original question follows...
> Sparc 5, Solaris 2.5.1
>
> When I run the following script
>
> ufsdump 0cfu /dev/rmt/0hn /dev/dsk/c0t3d0s0 <-- this is /
> ufsdump 0cfu /dev/rmt/0hn /dev/dsk/c0t3d0s6 <-- this is /usr
> ufsdump 0cfu /dev/rmt/0hn /dev/dsk/c0t3d0s5 <-- this is /opt
> ufsdump 0cfu /dev/rmt/0hn /dev/dsk/c0t1d0s6 <-- this is /disk1
> ufsdump 0cfu /dev/rmt/0h /dev/dsk/c0t2d0s6 <-- this is /disk2
>
> I get the following output, note that the device name in the records marked
> with >> appear to be wrong, and in fact, aren't on the tape (based on
> ufsrestore i).
>
> Can anyone offer an explaination?
> DUMP: Dumping /dev/rdsk/c0t3d0s6 (node.domain.org:/usr) to /dev/rmt/0hn.
> DUMP: 1095316 blocks (534.82MB) on 1 volume at 689 KB/sec
> >> DUMP: Dumping /dev/rdsk/c0t3d0s6 (node.domain.org:/disk1) to
/dev/rmt/0hn.
> DUMP: 1095316 blocks (534.82MB) on 1 volume at 694 KB/sec
> >> DUMP: Dumping /dev/rdsk/c0t3d0s6 (node.domain.org:/disk2) to
/dev/rmt/0h.
> DUMP: 1095316 blocks (534.82MB) on 1 volume at 689 KB/sec
Bruce Bowler, Research Associate 207.633.9600 (voice)
Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences 207.633.9641 (fax)
PO Box 475 BBowler@bigelow.org (email)
West Boothbay Harbor ME 04575 http://www.bigelow.org/